Ahrar center: Israel uses many torture means against Palestinian prisoners

GAZA, (PIC)-- Al-Ahrar center for human rights and prisoners’ studies stated Tuesday that Israel uses internationally-prohibited means during the detention of Palestinians much more than tying hands of prisoners behind their backs as admitted by the Shin Bet lately.

Director of the center Fouad Al-Khafsh cited as an example that Israeli officers do not confine to tying the hands of Palestinian prisoners during interrogation, but they also severely beat them, deprive them from sleep and douse them with cold water.

Khafsh added that the Israeli allegations that tying the hands of prisoners behind their backs is something necessary to prevent prisoners from escaping or attacking interrogators is a flimsy pretext because everyone entering Israeli jails knows well the security fortifications and measures in such places.

The center director noted that these Israeli claims came after an Israeli organization submitted a complaint against the way of tying Palestinian detainees during interrogation.

He called on all organizations concerned with human and prisoners’ rights to file complaints with international institutions about Israel’s violations against Palestinians’ rights in its jails.

In another context, the Palestinian ministry of health in the Gaza Strip strongly denounced Israel for kidnapping a Palestinian patient called Ahmed Asfour as he was on his way to a hospital in occupied Jerusalem to receive medical treatment from injuries he sustained during an Israeli missile attack on the town of Abassan in January 2009.

In a press release, the ministry said that Asfour obtained approval to pursue his medical treatment in the French hospital in Jerusalem after his family coordinated his transfer to the hospital, but during his attempt along with his father to cross Beit Hanoun checkpoint last Wednesday, Israeli soldiers maltreated them, forced them to undress and confiscated their IDs, medical documents and medicines, before rounding him up.

It appealed to human rights organizations to intervene to get the patient released immediately from Israeli jails.

For his part, specialist in prisoners’ affairs Abdelnasser Farawana stated Tuesday that Israel’s insistence on not releasing hundreds of old prisoners and its evasion of its responsibilities towards the settlement process are the main reasons that prompted the Palestinian resistance to stick to its demands regarding the prisoner swap deal.

In a statement, Farawana opined that Israel’s insistence on excluding old prisoners from any deal, maltreating them and not providing them with basic needs, which led to the deterioration of their health conditions, made the captors of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit demand their release because there is no other way to free them after the failure of the settlement process to do so.

http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/en/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcOd87MDI46m9rUxJEpMO%2bi1s7c4ToxheOy5WedFd9atRapBEHeNy%2bEdXL2OkNpl%2beJrxAcm%2f3LQx%2foRQugTacgCLjB2rJYQQoHenEYDDCXCZwCcFtGSoglnmNDMzfe%2f49uYE%3d

Former UK ambassador: CIA sent people to be ‘raped with broken bottles’

The CIA relied on intelligence based on torture in prisons in Uzbekistan, a place where widespread torture practices include raping suspects with broken bottles and boiling them alive, says a former British ambassador to the central Asian country.

Craig Murray, the rector of the University of Dundee in Scotland and until 2004 the UK's ambassador to Uzbekistan, said the CIA not only relied on confessions gleaned through extreme torture, it sent terror war suspects to Uzbekistan as part of its extraordinary rendition program.

"I'm talking of people being raped with broken bottles," he said at a lecture late last month that was re-broadcast by the Real News Network. "I'm talking of people having their children tortured in front of them until they sign a confession. I'm talking of people being boiled alive. And the intelligence from these torture sessions was being received by the CIA, and was being passed on."

Human rights groups have long been raising the alarm about the legal system in Uzbekistan. In 2007, Human Rights Watch declared that torture is "endemic" to the country's justice system.

Murray said he only realized after his stint as ambassador that the CIA was sending people to be tortured in Uzbekistan, country he describes as a "totalitarian" state that has never moved on from its communist era, when it was a part of the Soviet Union.

Suspects in Uzbekistan's gulags "were being told to confess to membership in Al Qaeda. They were told to confess they'd been in training camps in Afghanistan. They were told to confess they had met Osama bin Laden in person. And the CIA intelligence constantly echoed these themes."

"I was absolutely stunned -- it changed my whole world view in an instant -- to be told that London knew [the intelligence] coming from torture, that it was not illegal because our legal advisers had decided that under the United Nations convention against torture, it is not illegal to obtain or use intelligence gained from torture as long as we didn't do the torture ourselves," Murray said.

IT'S THE PIPELINE, STUPID

Murray asserts that the primary motivation for US and British military involvement in central Asia has to do with large natural gas deposits in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. As evidence, he points to the plans to build a natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan that would allow Western oil companies to avoid Russia and Iran when transporting natural gas out of the region.

Murray alleged that in the late 1990s the Uzbek ambassador to the US met with then-Texas Governor George W. Bush to discuss a pipeline for the region, and out of that meeting came agreements that would see Texas-based Enron gain the rights to Uzbekistan's natural gas deposits, while oil company Unocal worked on developing the Trans-Afghanistan pipeline.

"The consultant who was organizing this for Unocal was a certain Mr. Karzai, who is now president of Afghanistan," Murray noted.

Murray said part of the motive in hyping up the threat of Islamic terrorism in Uzbekistan through forced confessions was to ensure the country remained on-side in the war on terror, so that the pipeline could be built.

"There are designs of this pipeline, and if you look at the deployment of US forces in Afghanistan, as against other NATO country forces in Afghanistan, you'll see that undoubtedly the US forces are positioned to guard the pipeline route. It's what it's about. It's about money, it's about oil, it's not about democracy."

The Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline is slated to be completed in 2014, with $7.6 billion in funding from the Asian Development Bank.

Murray was dismissed from his position as ambassador in 2004, following his first public allegations that the British government relied on torture in Uzbekistan for intelligence.


The following videos were posted to YouTube by the Real News Network on Oct. 26 and Nov. 4, 2009.



http://rawstory.com/2009/11/ambassador-cia-people-tortured/